Sep 5, 2008
Argument acrobats searched
Hype on the one hand, Google and the other against the retention of the demo site (motto: "Against the total logging of telephone, mobile phone, e-mail and the Internet"). How does that work? Commentators critical of his questioning would not or could not explain the views of the Spree at least so far.
Sorry, I'm sorry, but I can not really understand how serious a law for all the systematic surveillance of all citizens of a country in all seriousness, can compare with a web browser, in which the use of a few good features the completely voluntary transfer of one tap some unimportant (and yes, as I start a domain is completely irrelevant) data is needed.
Apart from that I have talked up Chrome at no time. Chrome is a groundbreaking technology demo, the core elements we find in a few years in any browser. No more, no less.
Is quite simple: The demo is directed against the state _and_ against businesses that collect excessive data. So be who is consistently demonstrating against Google.
I wonder how you can downplay this context, the activities of Google. To learn more about the many hidden features sniffing of Chrome, I recommend the latest coverage on heise.de.
And who believes that the hoards of Google data are less relevant than that of the "State" collected need only study the case that Israeli Bloggers consider means of identification, Google has given the prosecutors with the necessary data.
What data hoard Google anyway? It always all tuen as if Google would save enormous amounts of data systematically and analyze concrete evidence I've ever seen but no, even if that should be such admittedly not very easy to use.
What has this to do with the browser still times I would be interested.
For starters, two references must suffice to outline the intention and practice of Google:
1. "Google's Data Protection Fleischer made it clear that Google's business model is based on the use of personal IP addresses:" We need to know who asked that ... "
2. While the debate about whether an IP address is a personal day or not, still in full swing, but there were also alternative methods of user tracking: "If the users do not regularly delete the cookies, Google has in addition to the IP addresses on the ability to create user profiles based on cookies, to facilitate the identification of a case. "
(Source: http://software.magnus.de/internet/artikel/google-ip-adressen-sind-keine-personenbezogenen-daten.html)
[...] Last but not least Max has raised the question in the commentary on the data store at all because Google seems to me this [...]